The End of Empire
Dismantle oppression. Deepen democracy. Destroy tyranny.
- Ask me anything /
- Submit /
- RSS /
- Archive
Posts tagged president
The Other 9/11 - Chile 1973
BBC 4 documentary
On September 11, 1973 a military coup was started by General Augusto Pinochet that ousted the democratically elected President Salvador Allende of Chile. Allende’s was the first democratically elected Marxist government in the world. This documentary produced by BBC Four is a chronicle of the event from witnesses and archive footage. A chilling and moving account of the day by perpetrators, as well as those at receiving end, who survived to tell this story of a defining moment in Chile’s history. It changed Chile forever. It is the only full length (almost 1 hour) documentary in English on it. Also, it is the only documentary that takes into account both sides of the story.
About every documentary I’ve found on Allende skips 1970-1973, and just glosses over the economic problems, causes of strikes, inflation, role of US pledge to “make the economy scream”
If anyone can recommend a little reading, or another documentary or something, I’d be very grateful. Thanks!
Jimmy McMillan, Rent Is Too Damn High Party
from an interview with isidewith.com on his presidential campaign
My favorite Republican Communist.
Get ‘em Jimmy. Seriously. I’m behind you all the way.
Guardian: Obama himself has never challenged the kind of rapacious capitalism he is desperate to associate with his opponent
Thanks again to Critical Reading
Just a couple of months into his presidency he called a meeting of banking executives. But instead of representing the interests of those who voted for him and had been hardest hit by the crisis – the poor, union members, black people and Latinos – he sided with those who funded him and precipitated the crisis: “I’m not out there to go after you,” he told them. “I’m protecting you.”
As one of the bankers told Ron Suskind inThe Confidence Men: “The sense of everyone after the meeting was relief. The president had us at a moment of real vulnerability. At that point, he could have ordered us to do just about anything and we would have rolled over. But he didn’t – he mostly wanted to help us out, to quell the mob. And the guy we figured we had to thank for that was [Treasury secretary] Tim [Geithner]. He was our man in Washington.” This is what makes Democratic attacks on the business record of Republican presumptive nominee Mitt Romney so difficult to swallow. While their substance is sound and their target deserving, the source makes them hypocritical and opportunistic. The poor do not have “a man in Washington”. Romney deserves to be taken to task. However, it’s not a task the Democrats can credibly undertake since they have been complicit in the very practices for which they criticise him.
The Obama administration bows down to oil companies - yet again.
Obama announced a proposed rule that would require companies to disclose chemicals used during hydraulic fracturing (also known as fracking). However, in a compromise with corporations, such as ExxonMobil and XTO Energy, companies would only have to disclose such information after the well has been drilled, not before.
The original policy would have required companies to disclose chemicals at least 30 days prior to drilling. But Obama cracked under pressure by oil industry lobbyists to loosen regulations on oil & gas drilling.
Fracking has been known to contaminate groundwater, cause tremors & earthquakes, pollute at incredible rates, cause cancer from mishandling of waste & cause other health concerns from contaminated water, such as headaches, nausea, coughing & even memory loss.
So freaking ironic. Obama’s crew just released an add against the Romney campaign, painting them as slaves to Big Oil, and Obama as all squeaky clean and green.
If we do a few minutes of homework and record checking, it’s easy to see that the Obama administration has indeed “bowed down to big oil”, as thepeoplesrecord pointed out.
So, like the Obama campaign suggested in their add, I’m gonna get on “Tumblr or whatever that is”, and call their bluff.
Incredible hypocrisy
Class A bullshit
:) …have there been ANY good movies with class war recently?
Obama “Slow Jams” a Campaign Ad
Here’s a little propaganda for you. President Obama announcing his policy on student loan intrest rates on a comedy show.
What’s that policy, you ask? Is he gonna make government loans free of interest to student? Is he going to forgive some, or maybe all of current student loan debt?
Nope.
Well, is he planning to at least IMPROVE the current policy somehow?
Nope.
Well what the hell? What does he have to say?
“Republicans want to increase the intrest rates on student loans. I think that’s a bad idea. We need to keep college affordable.”
Wait, what? Was college affordable? Ok, hold on…
You went out of your way to appear on a comedy show to announce that you’re just going to DEFEND and already oppressive STATUS QUO?!?!
Looks like you just bought yourself roaring applause, circulated to tens of millions of (young) voters, and the tacit endorsement of Jimmy Fallon and all of hip-youth-ery.
Well played, sir. Strong propaganda. Well played.
“Remember to vote for me, cause those Republicans over there are freakin crazy. I’m all you got. REMEMBER that. Criticizing me is futile.”
I’m impressed, but even more disgusted. This is our more progressive option.
No, I’ve forgotten again. He’s never said he was a progressive. He’s a “consensus maker”. Bridging divides, and placing himself right in the middle: between right-center and fascist neocon.
I’m no Bolshevik, but I recently read a quote from Lenin. He was asked whether British revolutionary workers should support the Labour Party candidate in the elections. He called on them to support the candidate “in the same way as the rope supports a hanged man”. Should he win, workers across Britain would become dissolution with parliamentary system, and chose more radical routes.
I would not chose to endorse such a violent metaphor about the president. I would, however, like to suggest we stop cheering for our president. We don’t need the “audacity of hope” that a presidential election will be sufficient. We need the audacity to condemn, defy, and organize.
How cheap and disgusting the applause… how empty and, yes, audacious the rhetoric, as if there was still hope that we can make significant progressive gains, or EVEN STAND IN DEFENSE of the gains won by past progressive struggles, by throwing all our support behind this president.
The audacity indeed.
He has the audacity to woo us again.
We need the audacity - the resolve, the ingenuity and the courage - to move beyond this system.

